|
|
|
Publications
By Principal Investigator(s):
| Armour, J. et al. (2009) Shareholder protection and stock market development: an empirical test of the legal origins hypothesis, Centre for Business Research (CBR) Working Paper No. 358 and European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI) Law Working Paper No. 108.
Armour, J. et al. (2009) ‘How do legal rules evolve? Evidence from a cross-national comparison of shareholder, creditor and worker protection’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(3), pp.579-629.
Deakin, S. (2009) ‘Legal origin, juridical form and industrialisation in historical perspective: the case of the employment relationship and the joint stock company’, Socio-Economic Review, 7, pp.35-65.
Deakin, S. and Sarkar, P. (2008) ‘Assessing the long-run economic impact of labour law systems: a theoretical reappraisal and analysis of new time series data’, Industrial Relations Journal, 39, pp.453-487.
Deakin, S., Lele, P. and Siems, M. (2007) ‘The evolution of labour law: calibrating and comparing regulatory regimes’, International Labour Review, 146, pp.133-162.
Deakin, S. and Rebérioux, A. (2009) ‘Corporate governance, labour relations and human resource management in Britain and France: convergence or divergence’ in J.-P. Touffut (ed.) Does Corporate Ownership Matter?, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lele, P. and Siems, M. (2007) ‘Shareholder protection: a leximetric approach’, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 7, pp.17-50.
Sarkar, P. (2009) ‘Corporate governance, stock market development and private capital accumulation: a case study of India’ in S. Marjit (ed.) India Macroeconomics Annual 2008, New Delhi: Sage India.
Sarkar, P. (2009) ‘Do the English legal origin systems have more dispersed share ownership and more developed financial systems?’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 16, pp.73-86.
Siems, M. (2008), ‘Shareholder protection around the world (“Leximetric II”)’, Delaware Journal of Corporate Law, 33 pp.111-147.
Siems, M. (2007) ‘The end of comparative law’, Journal of Comparative Law, 2, pp.133-150. | | |
|
|
|
|
Print-friendly page