ÿþ<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN'> <html><head><title>Title Page</title><meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html; charset=iso-8859-1'><style type='text/css'>h1 { margin:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px; font-size:large; font-weight:900; font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; text-align:center; color:#000; }h2 { font-size:medium; font-weight:900; font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; margin:10px 0px -2px 0px; padding:0px; color:#000; }h2.myclass { font-size:medium; font-weight:900; font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; margin:10px 0px -2px 0px; padding:0px; color:#000; text-align:center;}h3 { font-size:13px; font-weight:700; font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; margin:0px 0px -1px 0px; padding:0px; color:#07a; }h3.myclass { font-size:13px; font-weight:700; font-family:verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif; margin:0px 0px -1px 0px; padding:0px; color:#07a; text-align:center;}h4 { font-size:x-large; font-family:garamond, serif; color:#09f; text-align:center; margin:0px 0px 5px 0px; padding:0px;}h5 { font-size:13px; font-family:verdana, arial,sans-serif; font-weight:600; margin:0px 0px 5px 50px; padding:0px;}i.myclass{color:#07a;}</style></head><body> <H1> Streaming Longitudinal Study; Pupils, 1967 </H1> <H3 class='myclass'> UKDA study number:7</h3> <H2 class='myclass'>Principal Investigator</H2> <H3 class='myclass'> National Foundation for Educational Research<br> </H3> <H2 class='myclass'>Distributed by</H2> <H3 class='myclass'>UK Data Archive, University of Essex, Colchester.</H3> <H3 class='myclass'> </H3> <div style='page-break-before:always'></div> <H1>&nbsp;</H1><H1>Bibliographic Citation</H1> <H5> All works which use or refer to these materials should acknowledge these sources by means of bibliographic citation. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for bibliographic indexes, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: </h5> <H5> National Foundation for Educational Research, <i> Streaming Longitudinal Study; Pupils, 1967</i> [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor], 1976. SN: 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7-1 </h5><H1>&nbsp;</H1> <H1 >Acknowledgement</h1> <h5> Any publication, whether printed, electronic or broadcast, based wholly or in part on these materials, should acknowledge the original data creators, depositors or copyright holders, the funders of the Data Collections (if different) and the UK Data Archive, and to acknowledge Crown Copyright where appropriate. <br> Any publication, whether printed, electronic or broadcast, based wholly or in part on these materials should carry a statement that the original data creators, depositors or copyright holders, the funders of the Data Collections (if different) and the UK Data Archive bear no responsibility for their further analysis or interpretation. </h5><H5>&nbsp;</H5> <H1>Disclaimer</H1> <h5> Although all efforts are made to ensure the quality of the materials, neither the original data creators, depositors or copyright holders, the funders of the Data Collections, nor the UK Data Archive bear any responsibility for the accuracy or comprehensiveness of these materials.<br> </h5><h5>&nbsp;</h5><h5>All rights reserved. No part of these materials may be reproduced, stored in, or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the UK Data Archive.<br><br>UK Data Archive<br> University of Essex<br> Wivenhoe Park<br> Colchester<br> Essex C04 3SQ<br> United Kingdom<br>www.data-archive.ac.uk <br><br> </h5> <h2 style='page-break-before:always'> 7 . Streaming Longitudinal Study; Pupils, 1967<br> </h2><h3>&nbsp;</h3> <h3>Depositor:</h3> <h5>National Foundation for Educational Research</h5> <h3>Principal Investigator:</h3> <h5>National Foundation for Educational Research</h5> </H5> <h3> Abstract: </h3> <h5>The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of streaming and non-streaming on the personality, and social and intellectual development of junior school pupils. The data are held under nine separate study numbers; one for each of the eight surveys and one for the merged file. The study covers a four-year period. In the first year, 1964 (Surveys SN:008 and SN:009), a cross-sectional study of 84 schools, 42 matched pairs of streamed and non-streamed schools, was made. In the succeeding three years, this number was reduced as schools dropped out due to changes in organisation or to reductions in numbers of pupils or staff. In the end, only schools that had completed the full research programme were considered in the longitudinal study, that is, data from 72 schools or 36 matched pairs. The longitudinal study was concerned, therefore, with those children who were in their first year in 1964 and who remained in the school throughout the whole of the junior course - 5521 pupils in all. The data are of two main types, those concerned with pupils and those concerned with teachers. SN:261 is a merged file of datasets for pupils (SN:007, SN:008, SN:010, SN:012).</h5><h3>Main Topics:</h3><h5> Teachers (SN:006, SN:009, SN:011, SN:013)<br> To assess the further variables relating to teachers in the schools, three questionnaires were employed. In one, Questionnaire S1, 14 types of lessons were listed together with six possible frequencies ranging from 'everyday' to 'less than once a term or never'. Teachers were asked to indicate their frequency of use for each type of lesson. For the purpose of scoring, the lesson types were divided into two categories: 'traditional' and 'progressive'. In addition, two further questions were included, one dealing with grouping within the class and the other with seating arrangements. In the second questionnaire, S3, attitudes of teachers towards seven aspects of teaching in junior schools were examined. A list of 40 statements was prepared and given to teachers who were asked to indicate their degree of agreement or disagreement with each statement. The responses were grouped in seven attitude areas: permissive/non-permissive, attitude to physical punishment, to 11+ selection, to noise in the classroom, to A-streams, and to the less able child. In addition, in a personal data questionnaire, teachers gave information about themselves, their sex, age, qualifications and number of years teaching experience. A parental attitudes questionnaire was sent to parents of pupils in 28 schools in 1966 and 1967.<br> Pupils (SN:007, SN:008, SN:010, SN:012, SN:261).<br> To measure achievement, pupils were given a battery of tests at the end of each of the four junior school years. The tests were specially devised to be suitable for all ages from seven to ten-plus. Two parallel versions of each test were administered, one version to half the matched pairs, the second to the other half. Tests administered followed this schedule:<br> 1964 (SN:008)<br> Reading<br> English<br> Problem Arithmetic<br> Mechanical Arithmetic<br> Number Concept<br> 1965 (SN:010)<br> Reading<br> English<br> Problem Arithmetic<br> Mechanical Arithmetic<br> Verbal Reasoning<br> 1966 (SN:012)<br> Reading<br> English<br> Problem Arithmetic<br> Mechanical Arithmetic<br> Number Concept<br> Verbal/Non-Verbal<br> Reasoning<br> Free Writing SA1 & SB2<br> 1967 (SN:007)<br> Reading<br> English<br> Problem Arithmetic<br> Mechanical Arithmetic<br> Number Concept<br> Verbal/Non-verbal<br> Reasoning<br> Free writing SA1 & SB2<br> To measure the effects of school organisation on personality, attitudes and social adjustment, a number of non-cognitive variables were considered, following the schedule below:<br> 1964<br> Sociometric data<br> School activities<br> <br> 1966<br> Sociometric data<br> Interests<br> Aspirations<br> Pupils' Attitudes & Parents' Attitudes in 28 Schools<br> Sociometric data<br> Interests<br> School Activities<br> Pupils' Attitudes in 28 Schools<br> The sociometric questionnaire provided information on the `popularity' of a pupil and identified those who were 'neglected', In 1964, teachers indicated the first and second choice of friends for each pupil; in 1966 and 1967, the pupil himself completed the questionnaire, including two new criteria, 'who would you like to play with?' and 'who would you like to work with?' In 1966 and 1967, an interests questionnaire was administered, dividing interests into two categories, 'creative' and 'logical/analytical'. Also included were a teacher-rating of behaviour on a four-point scale on five isolated behaviour traits; a teacher rating of school achievement, including attitude to school work, class position in reading and class position in arithmetic; a general ability rating in all years on a five-point scale; and, in 1964 and 1967, a teacher assessment of individual pupil's participation in school activities. A questionnaire, comprising 79 statements, was administered to pupils in 28 schools in 1966 and 1967. The resulting scale measured pupils' attitudes in ten areas, including academic self-image, anxiety rating, social adjustment, relationship with teacher, importance of doing well, attitude to school, interest in school work, conforming versus non-conforming behaviour, attitude to class, and 'other image of class'. The chief background independent variables were pupil's age, sex, social class, school attendance and absenteeism (in years 2, 3 and 4), position in class and physical disabilities.</h5> <h3>Coverage: </h3><h5> <br><i class='myclass'>Dates of Fieldwork: </i> 1967 <br><i class='myclass'>Country: </i> England <br><i class='myclass'>Observation Units: </i> Individuals; Groups; Institutions/organisations </h5> <h3>Universe Sampled: </h3><h5> <i class='myclass'>Location of Units of Observation:</i> National <br><i class='myclass'>Population:</i> Pupils and teachers in junior or infant/junior, non-denominational schools in England: matched pairs of streamed and non-streamed schools based on type of school (junior, junior with infant, urban or rural), number of classes in school, average number of pupils per class, geographical region, percentage of pupils' parents in professional, clerical and skilled occupations and percentage of children in local education authority who attended non-selective schools </h5> <h3>Methodology: </h3><h5> <i class='myclass'>Time Dimensions: </i> Longitudinal/panel/cohort <br><i class='myclass'>Number of Units:</i> SN:006 (1967) Teachers = 194<br> SN:007 (1967) Pupils = 7552 at ages 8/9/10+<br> SN:008 (1964) Pupils = 32981 at ages 7+<br> SN:009 (1964) Teachers = 937<br> SN:010 (1965) Pupils = 14984 at ages 8+<br> SN:011 (1966) Teachers = 469<br> SN:012 (1966) Pupils = 8440 at ages 9+<br> SN:013 (1966) Teachers = 288<br> SN:261 (1964 - 67) Merged pupils = 5198<br> Note: Complete longitudinal data cases on only 5,521 pupils in matched sample of 72 schools<br> 7552 (obtained) Pupils <br><i class='myclass'>Method of Data Collection: </i> Educational measurements; For details see <i>Streaming in the primary school</i> </h5><h3>Language(s) of Written Materials: </h3> <h5>Study Description: English<br>Study Documentation: English<br></h5> <h3>Access: </h3><h5> <i class='myclass'>Access Conditions: </i> The depositor has specified that registration is required and standard conditions of use apply. The depositor may be informed about usage. See <a href='/orderingdata/termsandConditions.asp'>terms and conditions</a> for further information. <br><i class='myclass'>Availability: </i> ESDS Access and Preservation, UK Data Archive <br><i class='myclass'>Contact: </i></b> Help desk: help@esds.ac.uk<br> </h5> <h3>Date of First Release:</h3><h5> 1976<br></h5> <br><br> <h3> File last updated: </h3> <h5>19 December 2011</h5> </body></html>